Gujarat’s Disturbed Areas Act challenged in high court

Times of India | 4 days ago | 06-08-2022 | 06:44 am

Gujarat’s Disturbed Areas Act challenged in high court

AHMEDABAD: Gujarat's controversial Disturbed Areas Act was challenged in the Gujarat high court on Friday on the ground that the law does not leave a scope for residents to register any objection against an area being demarcated as a communally disturbed area. Petitioner Ali Hussain Vohra from Vadodara has filed the petition through advocate Jitendra Malkan, who submitted that the Gujarat Prohibition of Transfer of Immovable Properties and Provision for Protection of Tenants from Eviction from Premises in the Disturbed Areas Act is in violation of principle of natural justice. This is because the provisions in this law provide that the authorities are not obliged to invite objections from public before declaring an area as communally disturbed. Malkan submitted that the Gujarat Town Planning Act provides for a provision that before taking any decision with regard to land or area, which is likely to change propriety right of any citizen, the authorities must hear the property owner. The hearing must take place because changing nature of the area imposes certain restrictions on properties. The earmarking of any areas under the Disturbed Areas Act imposes certain restrictions on transactions of properties and it affects the market rates. But this law does not have any provision of inviting any suggestion or objection before demarcating the area under this Act. In fact, the law says that the authority can do it without inviting challenge or objection from people, and merely on the basis of satisfaction on part of the authorities that riots and violence take place in the area. This is in violation of the principle of natural justice, he argued. The petitioner had filed a similar petition in 2020 but withdrew it later. The court asked the petitioner's counsel to supply the record of earlier litigation. The court also inquired about other litigation challenging legality of provisions of the law. In response, the state government submitted that two petitions are pending in which the 2019 amendment was challenged because the amendment was against the spirit of diversity and plurality. A Muslim outfit Jamiat Ulama Hind had sought a stay on 3(1)(2) and (3) of the amended Act, which empowers the authorities to permanently declare any area as communally disturbed merely on apprehension that the demography could be changed if people of a particular community would buy properties from other community. In January 2021, the HC stayed the amendment. Besides, certain notifications earmarking different areas as communally disturbed have also been under challenge. The HC has posted the case for hearing on September 6.

Google Follow Image


Similar News

Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited sets up probe over farmers ‘seizing’ computers
The Indian Express | 7 hours ago | 10-08-2022 | 12:50 am
The Indian Express
7 hours ago | 10-08-2022 | 12:50 am

The Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNNL) Tuesday set up a probe into the incident of a group of farmers from Vadodara allegedly taking possession of moveable assets from the department’s office in Gandhinagar on Saturday to recover their long-pending dues as ordered by a civil court.JP Gupta, Managing Director of SSNNL, said Tuesday that the department has set up an inquiry into the matter where a group of farmers allegedly “seized computers and peripherals” from the office of the department, citing the “execution of an attachment warrant” issued by a Vadodara court over pending compensation to be handed out by the SSNNL to the farmers for land acquired in 1988 to build the Narmada canal. Gupta said, “There were multiple litigations in this particular case– which is of the several land acquisitions made by SSNNL in the 1980s. The SSNNL had even paid the compensation decided by one local court. Thereafter, the matter went to the Gujarat High Court and was referred back to the district court, which again specified the amount of compensation… The total amount that is yet to be paid is only about Rs 30 lakh as a majority of the compensation has been paid. The only reason why this sum was yet to be handed out was that the legal department was in the process of deciding on a review of the matter. There was a miscommunication otherwise SSNNL has paid nearly Rs 300 crores as land compensations for the projects so far.”Gupta added that he has sought a report from the department to ascertain if the group of farmers and their advocate indulged in vandalism in the name of the court warrant. “We had even sanctioned depositing the amount in court but there was a lag… However, even if the court has issued an attachment warrant, it cannot be executed by a group of persons and their lawyer. The court officers arrive to oversee the procedure of property attachment and we would have complied with court orders. We are yet to determine how the group of persons and their advocate gained entry and seized property… We do not know if the officers present in that office on the day have seen the court notice cited by the group. I have sought a report from the officer and we will decide our further course of action based on it,” Gupta said.A group of 25 farmers from Abhol village in Padra taluka of Vadodara district have claimed that the SSNNL owes them a total of Rs 68.92 lakh at the rate of Rs 1,625 per arey (about 100 sq metres) of land acquired in 1988. The litigants have contended that the SSNNL paid them Rs 1,400 per arey in 2005, which was Rs 225 per arey lesser than the promised compensation. The advocate of the farmers has said that the court had dismissed the SSNNL’s review petition earlier this month and once again issued attachment warrants so that farmers can seize the movable property and recover their dues by selling it.

Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited sets up probe over farmers ‘seizing’ computers
Monsoon Session adjourned 4 days ahead of schedule
The Indian Express | 1 day ago | 09-08-2022 | 03:50 am
The Indian Express
1 day ago | 09-08-2022 | 03:50 am

The Monsoon Session of Parliament ended on Monday, with both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha adjourned sine die four days ahead of schedule.The session, which began on July 18 and was scheduled to go on till August 12 , saw protests by the Opposition over various issues, including price-rise, Agnipath scheme and purported misuse of central probe agencies by the Centre.During the session, the two Houses held only 16 sittings each. In terms of number of sittings, this was the second-shortest session of 17th Lok Sabha. So far, nine sessions of 17th Lok Sabha have been held and the fourth session was the shortest, with 10 sittings.Criticising the government for its decision to cut short the session, Trinamool MP Derek O’Brien tweeted, “This is the seventh consecutive time Parliament session has been cut short. Stop mocking Parliament. We will fight for its sanctity and prevent PM Narendra Modi and Amit Shah from turning this great institution into the Gujarat Gymkhana.”In his valedictory remarks, outgoing Rajya Sabha Chairman M Venkaiah Naidu said, “In all, the House had 16 sittings, during which it conducted its business for more than 35 hours. More than 47 hours were lost due to interruptions, which is a sad reflection on the functioning of the Upper House…”Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla said six government Bills were introduced and seven Bills passed during the session.The six Bill introduced in the Lower House are The Family Courts (Amendment) Bill, 2022; Central Universities (Amendment) Bill, 2022; Energy Conservation (Amendment) Bill, 2022; New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022; Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2022; and Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2022.The seven Bill passed in Lok Sabha are The Indian Antarctic Bill, 2022; Family Courts (Amendment) Bill, 2022; National Anti-Doping Bill, 2021; Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Bill, 2021; Central Universities (Amendment) Bill, 2022; Energy Conservation (Amendment) Bill, 2022; and New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022.In fact, the energy conservation Bill and arbitration centre Bill were passed on the last day of the session.Replying to the debate on the energy Bill, Power Minister R K Singh said India’s rate of renewable energy capacity has been the “fastest” in the world. The House later passed the Bill via voice vote.The Central Universities (Amendment) Bill, 2022, which seeks to establish Gati Shakti Vishwavidyalaya in Vadodara, Gujarat, was passed by voice vote in Rajya Sabha on the last day of the session, becoming one of five Bills to be passed by the House in the session.Introducing the Bill, Railways Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said the university would be conducted by his department and coordinated under the Nation Education Policy of the Education Ministry.

Monsoon Session adjourned 4 days ahead of schedule