FTII struggles due to backlog of batches, student protests, limited infrastructurePremium Story
The Indian Express | 1 week ago | 30-05-2023 | 01:45 pm
The Indian Express
1 week ago | 30-05-2023 | 01:45 pm
At Pune’s prestigious Film and Television Institute of India (FTII), students from the 2020 batch went on a hunger strike on May 15. They were protesting against the institute’s directions to one of their batchmates: repeat the semester “on account of failure to meet attendance and credit completion requirements”.Twelve days later, on May 26, the hunger strike was called off after five students were hospitalised. However, 42 others continue to boycott classes in protest. The batchmate repeating the semester as a supernumerary student with the next batch, they said, would mean that he would not be allowed to participate in any major group assignments. Since each student in a group has a fixed role to play in the practical exercises, he will have nothing to show for when he graduates, they added. An Academic Council meeting on the students’ demand — to allow him to continue with the current batch — is scheduled for Tuesday.The protest is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to issues plaguing FTII. In 2015, the students went on a 139-day strike against the appointment of TV actor Gajendra Chauhan as its chairperson. The protest attracted national attention, causing the government much embarrassment. At that time, there were five batches (2008 to 2013) of the film wing on campus instead of three. FTII had received flak then due to students overstaying on campus: some batches have taken as long as seven years to finish their three-year diploma. The administration had blamed the lockdown for the overcrowding.FTII Registrar Sayyid Rabeehashmi told The Indian Express, “The single reason for parallel batches on campus at present is the lockdown. FTII, along with Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute, took the decision to have parallel batches on campus instead of announcing zero years in the larger interest of aspiring storytellers.”However, the students alleged that lack of resources — studios, equipment and teaching staff — were to blame for the presence of parallel batches on campus.Trouble with revised syllabusIn June 2016, FTII implemented its revised syllabus and introduced the choice-based credit system (CBCS) system. The institute had earlier revised the syllabus in 2000. However, the 2000 revision led to delays in completion of courses on time. Following demands to fix these delays, the syllabus was revised once again and the changes were implemented in 2016.The administration had claimed that the latest revised syllabus would help students finish their courses on time and prevent a backlog of parallel batches on campus, which was putting extra pressure on its resources. The CBCS, it felt, would provide students greater freedom of choice, while allowing the administration to stick to the stipulated course durations of three years (two years for screenplay and screen acting diplomas).Nearly six years later, the administration is still grappling with the same problem. There are four batches of film wings on campus. A fifth one, the 2017 batch, is technically yet to finish the course since the results have not been announced, apart from two TV course batches. The admission process for another batch, 2022, is almost complete. The film wing admits 11 students each in seven courses, namely direction and screenplay writing, cinematography, editing, sound recording and sound design, art direction and production design, screen acting, and screen writing. The television wing has four one-year courses, namely direction, electronic cinematography, video editing and sound recording, and television engineering, each admitting 11 students annually.However, students from the batches of 2016 and 2017 have alleged the syllabus revision plan was implemented in a hurry in 2016.“We felt the revised syllabus wasn’t well thought out. For the 2016 batch, the administration kept making changes to the syllabus on the go. Exercises were dropped arbitrarily…. They also dropped the faculty feedback exercise, as envisaged in the original syllabus, after getting spooked due to the poor ratings that some of them were getting. This had led to protests from 2016 and 2017 batches,” said a student from the latter batch.Following protests and adverse feedback from department heads, FTII formed a committee to review the syllabus in December 2019. The outcome of this committee remains unknown. However, the Registrar said the revised syllabus had been working well. “The 2016 batch completed the course on time, but the 2017 batch completed the course in March 2023 due to the lockdown,” he said.Many vacancies, few studiosFaculty vacancies are another big issue affecting FTII. In almost all seven departments of the film wing and four departments of the TV wing, 60 to 80 per cent permanent positions — including heads of four film wings — have been lying vacant.To make up for these shortages, the institute has been increasingly relying on contractual faculty. However, delays in dispersing of salaries — at times till the last week of the month — have caused unhappiness among the contractual staff, some of whom are hired for short durations like two-three months.A few months ago, FTII finally commenced the process to fill these vacancies: dean (television), five vacancies for professors (HoDs), eight associate professors, six assistant professors and 81 vacancies in Classes B and C posts.“The recruitment process is on currently,” said the Registrar.Students have also pointed to the lack of infrastructure at FTII. The institute has just two production studios. This means that only two projects can be done at a time though there are five batches on campus at present. Since 2010, the administration has been talking about constructing two new studios on its land, off Paud Road, but the plans are yet to materialise.A student from the 2017 batch, which finished its final exercise just recently and is waiting for the results, said the lack of resources was primarily responsible for the delays affecting his and the subsequent batches.“Insufficient studios, lack of planning by the administration, understaffed departments and issues related to the syllabus have all caused this backlog. The administration may blame the lockdown but that isn’t the primary reason. The backlog will continue until these issues are resolved,” said the student.However, Rabeehashmi dismissed the allegation. “The statement that the lack of resources is a reason for the backlog is false and baseless. As such, the facilities at the institute are for three batches of film wing and one batch of TV wing. Therefore, the institute has already provisioned for addressing additional requirements to meet the academic exigencies,” the Registrar said, adding that the construction of the proposed studios will commence soon.Interim director, no chairpersonWhile protests by students have returned to FTII, it stick does not have a full-time director. Since the last director, Bhupendra Kainthola, was transferred after a six-year tenure — which included multiple extensions — in December 2021, he hasn’t been replaced yet. Professor Sandip Shahare has been filling in for the director since then.The institute’s governing council, its highest decision-making body, also remains headless. The tenure of director Shekhar Kapur, who was appointed chairperson of the governing council in September 2020, ended on March 3, but the government is yet to reconstitute the FTII Society.“The current protest at the institute is because of a decision taken by the Academic Council. In absence of the FTII Society, the AC has representatives from the administration and ex-officio members, apart from two student representatives. There are no FTII alumni or other members representing creative fields. That’s making the issue difficult to deal with,” said a former office-bearer of FTIISA.